PORTER’S
FIVE FORCES OF LOUIS VUITTON
Competitive Rivalry within the Industry: MODERATE
v The competitiveness in the
industry can be qualified as relatively high, but given the high margins and
the customer’s perception about the price, the competition is not on price, but
rather on quality and image perception, as well as on the ability to attract
the right designers with right abilities.
v
LV has gained many rivals in the luxury brand industry such as
Versace, Hermes, Burberry, Chanel, Prada, Gucci, Versace, Hermes and so on.
v
We believe the rising competition handbags and accessories
market is an overriding concern for Louis Vuitton’s stock in the near term.
v
Louis Vuitton is undertaking a transformation strategy to evolve
into a global lifestyle brand anchored in accessories. However, we believe this
transformation will take at least a few more quarters to reap the desired
results.
v
Increased private label offerings by wholesale customers also
increase the competition for Louis Vuitton.
Bargaining Power of Customers: LOW
v
Louis Vuitton sells through both, the direct-to-consumer channel
and the wholesale channel. The direct channel, which includes Louis Vuitton
operated stores and e-commerce sales accounted for around 89% of its total
sales in fiscal 2012.
v
Since wholesale customers account for only around 10% of the
total sales, we believe their bargaining power is limited.
v
We think the bargaining power of end-customers is moderate.
Louis Vuitton has positioned itself as an exclusive luxury brand and enjoys
strong brand recognition due to its high quality products.
v
We believe that the customers’ bargaining power will remain low
in the future as Louis Vuitton’s efforts to reinvigorate its brand appeal will
be offset by rising competition in the market.
Threat of New Entrants: LOW
v To start up a new brand, significant capital expenditure is required for marketing and floor space.Bargaining Power of Suppliers: LOW
v Louis Vuitton does not
manufacture its own products. Instead, it relies on manufacturers located in
various countries such as China, Vietnam, India, Philippines, Thailand, Italy
and the United States.
v Louis Vuitton has recently taken
over Les Tanneries Roux, a Romans-sure-Isere-based leather supplier.
v With this move to acquire key
suppliers will reduce the bargaining power of suppliers in terms of leather
products. By limiting the capability to play suppliers contrary to each other,
LV would be able to save costs on storage space and capable in making sure of
the quality of products supplied. In the case of LV’s bargaining power of
suppliers is relatively low.
v This is because the company often
purchases raw materials from suppliers in basis of consignment. With this method,
it reduces the loss marking and establishes economies of scale.
Threat of Substitute Products: LOW
v Louis Vuitton’s products are purchased by people in the
middle-to-high income group. As consumers in this income group like to wear
high-end luxury brands to display affluence, the demand for brands like Louis
Vuitton will continue.
v However, counterfeit products represent a grave threat for the
company, especially in emerging markets such as China. As the quality of
counterfeit products has been improving over the past few years, we believe
this problem has the potential to dilute the company’s brand value. Hence, this
is an area of concern for the company.
REFERENCES: